參賽方法 Registration Method

國際線上競賽。報名登記→ 網站上傳作品 (文件格式 doc/ pdf)
Online Competition

Registration → Upload entry on the website. (Files in photo doc/ pdf).

 

​

競賽組別 Competition Group

小學1-3年級 Primary Grades 1-3
小學4-6年級 Primary Grades 4-6
中學1-3年級 Secondary Grades 1-3
中學4-6年級 Secondary Grades 4-6
公開組 Open Group

 

** 參賽者自行選擇參賽組別。

Participants may self-select their competition group.

​

​

寫作主題及要求 Topic & Requirements

 

1. 參賽者需從指定主題選擇一個進行寫作。

Participants may select one of the following topics for submission.

​

• 題目一：青少年應否被禁止使用社交媒體？

• Topic 1: Should Social Media Be Banned for Youth?

​

在數位時代，社交媒體已成為青少年生活不可或缺的一部分，但其對心理健康、隱私安全及社交發展的影響也引發了全球性的討論。本主題邀請參賽者探討政府或學校是否應對青少年使用社交媒體設定法律限制或禁止政策。

​

參賽者可結合個人生活體驗與社會觀察，從全球政策、演算法機制、網路安全、心理健康以及個人自由等多元角度，客觀分析限制政策的可行性、潛在影響與利弊平衡。

 

In the digital age, social media has become an integral part of youth life. However, its impacts on mental health, privacy security, and social development have sparked widespread global debate. This theme invites participants to examine whether governments or educational institutions should implement legal restrictions or bans on youth social media access.

 

Participants are encouraged to combine personal experiences and societal observations to critically analyze policy feasibility, algorithm mechanisms, cybersecurity, mental health, and individual liberty, offering a balanced perspective on potential outcomes and trade-offs from a global standpoint.

​

​

• 題目二：科技、創新與權力

• Topic 2: Technology, Innovation, and Power

​

突破性科技的誕生持續重塑著全球國際關係、國家競爭力與社會構造。本主題邀請參賽者分析技術創新如何改變世界權力格局與人類生活型態。

 

參賽者可選擇一項顯著改變人類社會的科技發明（如人工智慧、機器人、太空火箭或前沿醫療技術等），深入探討其如何重塑國家間的權力動態、地緣政治或全球社會結構（探討領域可涵蓋國防軍事、現代工業化、太空探索、公共衛生、國家監控或數位經濟等方面）。

 

Breakthrough technologies continuously reshape global international relations, national competitiveness, and social structures. This theme invites participants to analyze how technological innovations alter global power dynamics and human societal models.

 

Participants may select a pivotal technological breakthrough—such as artificial intelligence, robotics, space rocketry, or advanced medical technologies—to explore how it alters geopolitical influence, international power relations, or societal frameworks across sectors including defense, industrialization, space exploration, public health, surveillance, or the digital economy.

​

2.寫作語言：中文或英文。字數不限。

Language of writing: Chinese or English.​​ No Word Limit

​

3.參賽作品格式：文件 PDF/DOC。

Submission format: PDF or DOC file.

​

4.參賽者有責任確保所提交的檔案有效；參賽作品須為個人原創作品，翻譯作品概不接受，嚴禁抄襲及使用人工智能工具生成。每位參賽者只可遞交一份參賽作品。如多於一份參賽作品，以最早收到的一份為準，其餘作廢，並不作另行通知。

Participants are responsible for ensuring the submitted files are valid; all entries must be original individual works. Translated works are not accepted, Plagiarism and the use of AI tools for generation are strictly prohibited. Each participant may submit only one entry. If more than one entry is submitted, the earliest received will be considered valid, and the others will be disqualified without further notice.

​

5.參賽作品不能含有淫褻、暴力、色情、誹謗、不良意識、侮辱或任何具爭議性及不恰當之內容。主辦機構有權拒絕不恰當、與比賽主題無關或格式錯誤的參賽作品。主辦單位保留對比賽總規和章程的最終解釋權。若有任何有關本活動的爭議發生主辦單位的裁定為最終的裁決，任何人士均不得異議。參賽作品不能含有宣傳商業或政治元素。

Works must not contain pornographic, violent, erotic, defamatory, inappropriate, insulting, or controversial content. The organizer may reject works that are inappropriate, irrelevant, or incorrectly formatted. The organizer reserves the right to final interpretation of rules. All disputes are subject to the organizer’s final decision. Works must not include commercial or political promotion.

​​

​​​​​​

評分準則 Judging Criteria

作品將依據內容與觀點立意、論點論據、結構邏輯、用詞表達、主題切合度等評審維度進行綜合評分。評審團成員包括本協會顧問、各辦學團體代表，以及業界資深人士。評審對一切事宜保有最終決定權，其評分為最終決定，參賽者必須尊重及接受。

Submissions will be comprehensively evaluated based on key criteria, including depth of content and perspective, strength of arguments and evidence, structural logic, clarity and precise word choice, and relevance to the theme. The judging panel includes advisors from our association, representatives from various educational institutions, and industry veterans. The judges reserve full authority over all matters, and their decisions are final. All participants must respect and accept the evaluation results.