參賽方法 Registration Method

線上競賽。報名登記→ 網站上傳作品
Online Competition

Registration → Upload entry on the website.

​

​

比賽項目 Competition Category

詩詞創作 Poetry Writing​​

​

​

競賽組別 Competition Group

小學1-3年級 Primary Grades 1-3
小學4-6年級 Primary Grades 4-6
中學1-3年級 Secondary Grades 1-3
中學4-6年級 Secondary Grades 4-6
專業組 Professional Group

** 參賽者自行選擇參賽組別。

Participants may self-select their competition group.

​​

​​​​​​

作品要求 Requirements

1.寫作語言：中文或英文。

​​Writing Language: Chinese or English.

​

2.題目或主題不限。字數不限。參賽者自行選擇詩詞創作形式如詩歌、自由詩、現代詩、抒情詩、敘事詩、寓言詩、韻文詩等均可。

There are no restrictions on theme and word limit. Participants may choose the own poetic form, such as free verse, modern poetry, lyric poetry, narrative poetry, fable poetry, rhymed poetry, etc.

​

3.參賽作品格式：文件 PDF/DOC。

Format requirement: PDF/DOC.

4.參賽者有責任確保所提交的檔案有效；參賽作品須為個人原創作品，翻譯作品概不接受，嚴禁抄襲。每位參賽者每個項目只可遞交一份參賽作品。如多於一份參賽作品，以最早收到的一份為準，其餘作廢，並不作另行通知。

Participants are responsible for ensuring the submitted files are valid; all entries must be original individual works. Translated works are not accepted, and plagiarism is strictly prohibited. Each participant may submit only one entry per category. If more than one entry is submitted, the earliest received will be considered valid, and the others will be disqualified without further notice.

5.參賽作品不能含有淫褻、暴力、色情、誹謗、不良意識、侮辱或任何具爭議性及不恰當之內容。主辦機構有權拒絕不恰當、與比賽主題無關或格式錯誤的參賽作品。主辦單位保留對比賽總規和章程的最終解釋權。若有任何有關本活動的爭議發生主辦單位的裁定為最終的裁決，任何人士均不得異議。參賽作品不能含有宣傳商業或政治元素。
Works must not contain pornographic, violent, erotic, defamatory, inappropriate, insulting, or controversial content. The organizer may reject works that are inappropriate, irrelevant, or incorrectly formatted. The organizer reserves the right to final interpretation of rules. All disputes are subject to the organizer’s final decision. Works must not include commercial or political promotion.

​

​

評分準則 Judging Criteria

​作品將依據內容質量、觀點立意、結構邏輯、語言表達、修辭運用、主題切合度等評審維度進行綜合評分。評審團成員包括本協會顧問、各辦學團體代表，以及業界資深人士。評審對一切事宜保有最終決定權，其評分為最終決定，參賽者必須尊重及接受。

Entries will be comprehensively evaluated and scored based on the criteria of content quality, viewpoint and conception, structural coherence and logic, linguistic expression, rhetorical application, and thematic relevance. Judges will comprehensively evaluate entries based on the above criteria. The judging panel includes advisors from our association, representatives from various educational institutions, and industry veterans. The judges reserve full authority over all matters, and their decisions are final. All participants must respect and accept the evaluation results.